Direct effect of European Union law

The principle of direct effect was first established by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen.Direct effect is applicable when the particular provision relied on fulfils the Van Gend en Loos criteria.[10] However, the ECJ has always resisted a change of the Marshall case law so as to allow a general right to invoke on unimplemented directives against private parties.Further case law to demonstrate this practice is Francovich v Italy, where action could be taken against the government by an individual for their failure to implement a directive and the subsequent loss of rights suffered in court.In Grad v Finanzamt Traunstein,[12] a case involving VAT, the ECJ ruled that a decision could be directly effective, as they imposed an obligation to achieve a required result.[20] In Comet v. Produktschap,[21] the European Court of Justice established that the procedural rules of each member state generally apply to cases of EU law.
Van Gend en Loos v Ned BelastingenVan Duyn v Home OfficeDefrenne v Sabena (No 2)Von Colson v Land Nordrhein-WestfalenCommission v ItalyPubblico Ministero v RattiMarshall v Southampton Health AuthorityFaccini Dori v Recreb SrlCIA Security v Signalson and SecuritelPfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz eVKücükdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co KGFoster v British Gas plcMarleasing SA v La Comercial SAUnilever Italia SpA v Central Food SpAFrancovich v ItalyEU lawEuropean Union lawmember states of the European UnionEU TreatiesCourt of Justice of the European UnionVan Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der BelastingenregulationsdirectivesVan Gend en LoosEU CourtsDefrenne v. SABENA (No. 2)emanation of the stateFoster v. British Gas plcDecisionsDirective (European Union)Foster v British GasVan ColsonPubblico Ministero v. Rattiincidental effectsAG LenzSelf-executing rightEur-lexWayback MachineJudiciary and law of the European UnionEuropean Court of JusticemembersAdvocates GeneralGeneral CourtCivil Service TribunalEuropean lawyerRelationship with ECHRPublic ProsecutorEuropean civil codeTreatiesRome TreatyMerger TreatySingle European ActMaastricht TreatyAmsterdam TreatyNice TreatyLisbon TreatyCharter of Fundamental RightsOpt-outsAcquisRegulationDirectiveFramework DirectiveDecisionRecommendationDigital Services ActConsultation procedureConsent procedurePrinciplesAcquis communautaireDirect applicabilityEuropean labour lawEuropean Enforcement OrderGold-platingFour freedomsHome state regulationIndirect effectIncidental effectMinimum harmonisationMaximum harmonisationPreliminary rulingPrecautionary principlePrinciple of legal certaintyRecastingPrinciple of conferralProportionalityStaatenverbundState liabilitySubsidiaritySupremacyCouncil Regulation (EC) No. 1206/2001Council Regulation (EC) No. 1348/2000Customs Regulation 1383/2003Regulation (EC) No 261/2004EU-Eco-regulationCommission Regulation (EC) No. 2257/94Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1170/2011Customs Regulation 3295/94Regulation on roaming chargesBrussels RegimeCLP RegulationRegulation on Community designsSocietas EuropaeaEuropean Union System for the Evaluation of SubstancesCommission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006Rome II RegulationRule of Law Conditionality RegulationGood Clinical Practice DirectiveData Protection DirectiveATEX directiveBattery DirectiveBest available technologyBiocidal Products DirectiveBirds DirectiveCapital Requirements DirectivesClinical Trials DirectiveComputer Programs DirectiveConditional Access DirectiveCopyright Duration Directive (93/98/EEC)Copyright Term Directive (2006/116/EC)Cosmetics DirectiveDangerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC)Dangerous Preparations DirectiveData Retention DirectiveDatabase DirectiveDatabase rightDirective 2000/43/EC on Anti-discriminationDirective establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupationInformation Society DirectiveDirective on Privacy and Electronic CommunicationsDirective on the Promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transportDirective on the re-use of public sector informationDirective on Electricity Production from Renewable Energy SourcesEnd of Life Vehicles DirectiveCHP DirectiveDirective on the energy performance of buildingsDirective on the enforcement of intellectual property rightsDirective 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freelyEnvironmental liability directiveEuropean SEA Directive 2001/42/ECEuropean units of measurement directivesHabitats DirectiveIntegrated Pollution Prevention and ControlInternal Market in Electricity DirectiveLandfill DirectiveDirective on the legal protection of biotechnological inventionsDirective on the legal protection of designsMarkets in Financial Instruments DirectiveMeasuring Instruments DirectiveMedical Devices DirectivePosted Workers DirectivePressure Equipment DirectiveRental DirectiveResale Rights DirectiveRestriction of Hazardous Substances DirectiveSatellite and Cable DirectiveDirective on services in the internal marketTemporary and Agency Work DirectiveTrade Marks DirectiveEuropean Directive on Traditional Herbal Medicinal ProductsUnfair Commercial Practices DirectiveUniversal Service DirectiveUrban Waste Water Treatment DirectiveWaste Electrical and Electronic Equipment DirectiveWaste Incineration DirectiveWaste framework directiveWater Framework DirectiveWorking Time DirectiveECJ RulingsCaselexAllonby v Accrington and Rossendale CollegeApostolides v OramsBosmanCassis de DijonChacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SACiarán TobinColeman v Attridge LawCosta v ENELFactortameFrancovichKamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art LtdKolpakMicrosoft Corp. v. CommissionMarleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SAMetockNordseePalacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SAPeter Paul and Others v Bundesrepublik DeutschlandProcureur du Roi v DassonvilleRalf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent und MarkenamtTanja KreilCourt of AuditorsEuropean Anti-Fraud OfficeAccountability in the European Union