R v Jim

236, was a decision by the British Columbia Supreme Court on Aboriginal ("Indian") hunting and provincial game laws.In Victoria, British Columbia in 1914 a police magistrate convicted him of possession of a part of a deer in violation of the provincial Game Protection Act.Hunter interpreted the word "managed" to be broad in its application, and that it should include governing hunting and fishing on reserves (Indian lands).Hunter also noted that the federal government did regulate Aboriginal hunting in other provinces, suggesting it would have jurisdiction in British Columbia as well.As a constitutional scholar Peter Hogg wrote, "Hunting on a reserve is such a significant element of traditional Indian ways that it should probably be free of provincial regulation."

Indigenous peoplesin CanadaFirst NationsMétisTimelinePre-colonizationGeneticsSettler colonialismGenocideResidential schoolsIndian hospitalsReconciliationIndigenous lawBritish Columbia Treaty ProcessCrown and Indigenous peoplesHealth PolicyIdle No MoreIndian ActIndigenous and Northern Affairs CanadaLand BackLand claimsLand defenderLand titleMissing and Murdered Indigenous WomenNumbered TreatiesRoyal CommissionSelf-governmentSpecific claimsTreaty rightsIndigenous personalitiesCountry foodIndian reservesTerritoriesPacific CoastInuit languagesChinuk WawaIndigenous English DialectsAboriginal syllabicsChinuk pipaInuit grammarTraditional beliefsInuit religionIndex of articlesBritish Columbia Supreme CourtAboriginalgame lawsBritish North America Act, 1867North SaanichVictoria, British ColumbiaGovernor in CouncilBritish ColumbiaPeter HoggSupreme Court of CanadaKruger and al. v. The QueenList of notable Canadian lower court casesThe Canadian Crown and First Nations, Inuit and MétisSection Thirty-five of the Constitution Act, 1982Indian Health Transfer Policy (Canada)Canadian Aboriginalcustomary lawAboriginal land title in CanadaRoyal Proclamation of 1763Section 25 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsSection 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples ActConfederationCovenant ChainGreat Peace of MontrealNanfan TreatyPeace and Friendship TreatiesDouglas TreatiesGradual Civilization ActToronto PurchasePenetanguishene Bay PurchaseLake Simcoe–Lake Huron PurchaseTreaty 45Saugeen Tract AgreementRobinson TreatiesGradual Enfranchisement ActWhite PaperJames Bay and Northern Quebec AgreementNunavut Land Claims AgreementNisga'a Final AgreementPaix des BravesDuty to consult and accommodateJordan's PrincipleOngoing treaty negotiations in British ColumbiaAttorney General of Canada v LavellR v BadgerCalder v British ColumbiaChippewas of Sarnia Band v CanadaCorbiere v CanadaDaniels v CanadaDelgamuukw v British ColumbiaNative Women's Assn of Canada v CanadaKruger v RR v Marshall; R v BernardR v MarshallMitchell v MNRPaul v British ColumbiaPaulette CaveatPowley rulingR v DrybonesR v GladstoneR v GladueGladue reportR v GonzalesR v GuerinR v PamajewonR v SparrowRe EskimosSt Catharines Milling and Lumber Co v RR v Van der PeetTsilhqot'in Nation v British ColumbiaRestoule v CanadaIndigenous customary lawGrand CouncilMiꞌkmaqGreat Law of PeaceHaudenosauneePittailiniitWahkohtowinPlains CreeIndex of articles related to Indigenous Canadians