Desegregation busing
Starting in 1940, the Second Great Migration brought five million blacks from the agrarian South to the urban and manufacturing centers in Northern and Western cities to fill in the labor shortages during the industrial buildup of World War II and for better opportunities during the post-war economic boom.By 1960, all major Northern and Western cities had sizable black populations (e.g., 23% in Chicago, 29% in Detroit, and 32% in Los Angeles[citation needed]).Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP wanted a speedy process for desegregating the school districts, but the Court waited until the following year to make its recommendations.Reasons for delaying had to do with the changes in the Court and with Chief Justice Earl Warren steering a careful course given the expected opposition from Southern states.The lasting consequence of the Milliken decision is that it opened the door for whites to flee to the suburbs and not be concerned about compliance with mandatory integration policies.[7] With waning public support, the courts began relaxing judicial supervision of school districts during the 1990s and 2000s, calling for voluntary efforts to achieve racial balance.[12] With these decisions, the Rehnquist Court opened the door for school districts throughout the country to get away from judicial supervision once they had achieved unitary status.[13] The struggle to desegregate the schools received impetus from the Civil Rights Movement, whose goal was to end legal segregation in all public places.Signed by President Lyndon Johnson, the three laws were intended to end discriminatory voting practices and segregation of public accommodations and housing.[7] One argument against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that opponents of the proposed legislation found particularly compelling was that the bill would require forced busing to achieve certain racial quotas in schools.[citation needed] The impact of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was limited because whites and blacks tended to live in all-white or all-black communities.Delaware senator (and future 46th US President) Joe Biden said "I don't feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather,"[19] and that busing was "a liberal train wreck.Wherever the courts have backed away from mandating school districts to implement desegregation plans, resegregation of Blacks and Latinos has increased dramatically.While initially supported by Democrats, critics say the law has failed to adequately address the achievement gap between whites and minorities and that there are problems with implementation and inflexible provisions.[29] A 1978 study by the RAND Corporation set out to find why whites were opposed to busing and concluded that it was because they believed it destroyed neighborhood schools and camaraderie and increased discipline problems.[30] Ultimately, many black leaders, from Wisconsin State Rep. Annette Polly Williams, a Milwaukee Democrat, to Cleveland Mayor Michael R. White led efforts to end busing.[5] During the 1970s, 60 Minutes reported that some members of Congress, government, and the press who supported busing most vociferously sent their own children to private schools, including Senator Ted Kennedy, George McGovern, Thurgood Marshall, Phil Hart, Ben Bradlee, Senator Birch Bayh, Tom Wicker, Philip Geyelin, and Donald Fraser.[5] Researcher David Armour, also looking for hopeful signs, found that busing "heightens racial identity" and "reduces opportunities for actual contact between the races".[38] In 1965 Massachusetts passed into law the Racial Imbalance Act, which ordered school districts to desegregate or risk losing state educational funding.Much of the primary evidence for Springfield's busing plans stemmed from a March 1976 report by a committee for the Massachusetts Commission on Civil Rights (MCCR).[40] Charlotte operated under "freedom of choice" plans until the Supreme Court upheld Judge McMillan's decision in Swann v. Mecklenburg 1971.The entire program was built on the premise that extremely good schools in the inner-city area combined with paid busing would be enough to achieve integration.In May 1968, the Southern Nevada chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) filed a lawsuit against the Clark County School District (CCSD).The NAACP wanted the CCSD to acknowledge publicly, and likewise, act against the de facto segregation that existed in six elementary schools located on the city's Westside.As a result, the Las Vegas case, which became known as Kelly v. Clark County School District, was eventually heard by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.Organized protests against the busing plan began before the order was even official, led by future mayoral candidate Casey Jenkins.In 1979 and 1980, the Kelley case was again brought back to the courts because of the busing plan's failure to fully integrate the Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools (MNPS).This order was overturned by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on June 6, 1972, barring forced busing schemes that made students cross county/city boundaries.Beginning in 1973, due to federal court mandates, some 7,000 African-American students began to be bused from the IPS district to neighboring township school corporations within Marion County.This practice continued on until 1998, when an agreement was reached between IPS and the United States Department of Justice to phase out inter-district, one-way busing.
Busing (disambiguation)Charlotte, North CarolinaEducation in theUnited StatesHistory of education in the United StatesHistory of education in ChicagoHistory of education in KentuckyHistory of education in MassachusettsHistory of education in MissouriHistory of education in New York CityLiteracyNormal schoolsApprenticeship degreesArt educationCivic educationMusic educationLegal educationLaw schoolMedical educationMedical schoolNursing degreesEnvironmental educationLanguage educationMathematics educationSex educationVocational educationEducation policy issuesAccreditationPrimary and secondaryPost-secondaryEducational attainmentPost-secondary issuesBubbleCost and financingCredentialismElite overproductionStudent financial aidStudent loansCharter schoolsInequalityAchievement gapsRacial achievement gapGender achievement gapHead StartSchool choiceRacial diversitySchool segregationStandards-based reformSchool corporal punishmentSchool mealsSchool violenceSexual harassmentForeign involvementSpecial educationApprenticeshipSchool-to-work transitionCommunity collegesFor-profit higher educationFor-profit collegesResearch universitiesCommunity schoolFull-service community schoolsEarly childhoodK–12PrimarySecondaryU.S. Supreme CourtBrown v. Board of Educationpublic schoolsde factoSwann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educationwhite flightprivateparochial schoolsBlack schoolWorld War IIde jureSouthern statesJim Crow Lawsrestrictive covenantsSecond Great MigrationShelley v. Kraemersuburbiainner citiesracial segregationseparate but equalThurgood MarshallEarl WarrenBrown IISouthern ManifestoGreen v. County School Board of New Kent CountyBurger CourtNashvilleBostonracial integrationschool buskindergartenMilliken v. BradleyRehnquist CourtOklahoma Cityin 1991DeKalb CountyKansas Cityin 1995Roberts CourtParents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Act of 1964Voting Rights Act of 1965Civil Rights Act of 1968Lyndon Johnsonlegislativeexecutiveracial quotasEmanuel CellerJacob JavitsHubert HumphreyDepartment of Health, Education and WelfaresociologicalJames ColemanClinton High SchoolClevelandColumbus, OhioKansas City, MissouriPasadenaSan FranciscoRichmond