Argumentum ad baculum

Argumentum ad baculum (Latin for "argument to the cudgel" or "appeal to the stick") is the fallacy committed when one makes an appeal to force[1] to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion.[2][3][4] One participates in argumentum ad baculum when one emphasizes the negative consequences of holding the contrary position, regardless of the contrary position's truth value—particularly when the argument-maker himself causes (or threatens to cause) those negative consequences.It is a special case of the appeal to consequences.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives this example of argumentum ad baculum: The phrase has also been used to describe the 1856 caning of Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Senator, by one of his pro-slavery opponents, Preston Brooks, on the floor of the United States Senate.This logic-related article is a stub.
Threat of force (public international law)Threat displaycudgelfallacytruth valueappeal to consequencesStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophythe 1856 caningCharles SumnerabolitionistPreston BrooksUnited States SenateArgument from authorityFormal fallacyIn terroremLegal threatMight makes rightProof by intimidationLander UniversityWoods, JohnZalta, Edward N.The Illustrated London NewsSumnerfallaciesFormalpropositional logicAffirming a disjunctAffirming the consequentDenying the antecedentArgument from fallacyMasked manMathematical fallacyquantificational logicExistentialIllicit conversionProof by exampleQuantifier shiftSyllogistic fallacyAffirmative conclusion from a negative premiseNegative conclusion from affirmative premisesExclusive premisesNecessityFour termsIllicit majorIllicit minorUndistributed middleInformalEquivocationFalse equivalenceFalse attributionQuoting out of contextLoki's WagerNo true ScotsmanReificationCircular reasoningBegging the questionLoaded languageLeading questionCompound questionLoaded questionComplex questionCorrelative-basedFalse dilemmaPerfect solutionDenying the correlativeSuppressed correlativeIllicit transferenceCompositionDivisionEcologicalSecundum quidAccidentConverse accidentFaulty generalizationAnecdotal evidenceSampling biasCherry pickingMcNamaraBase rateConjunctionDouble countingFalse analogySlothful inductionOverwhelming exceptionAmbiguityAccentFalse precisionMoving the goalpostsSlippery slopeSorites paradoxSyntactic ambiguityQuestionable causeAnimisticFurtiveCum hocPost hocGambler'sInverseRegressionSingle causeTexas sharpshooterLaw/LegalityProof by assertionConsequencesWishful thinkingEmotionChildrenFlatteryNoveltyRidiculeIn-group favoritismInvented hereNot invented hereIsland mentalityLoyaltyParade of horriblesStirring symbolsWisdom of repugnanceGenetic fallacyAd hominemAppeal to motiveAssociationReductio ad HitlerumGodwin's lawReductio ad StalinumBulverismPoisoning the wellTu quoqueWhataboutismAuthorityAccomplishmentIpse dixitPovertyWealthEtymologyNatureTraditionChronological snobberyfallacies of relevanceArgumentsAd nauseamSealioningArgument from anecdoteArgument from silenceArgument to moderationArgumentum ad populumClichéThe Four Great ErrorsI'm entitled to my opinionIgnoratio elenchiInvincible ignoranceMoralisticNaturalisticMotte-and-bailey fallacyPsychologist's fallacyRationalizationRed herringTwo wrongs make a rightSpecial pleadingStraw man