Wetware computer

The most notable prototypes have stemmed from the research completed by biological engineer William Ditto during his time at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[3] His work constructing a simple neurocomputer capable of basic addition from leech neurons in 1999 was a significant discovery for the concept.The combination of “hardware” and “software” into one dynamic, and interdependent system which uses organic molecules and complexes to create an unconventional model for computational devices is a specific example of applied biorobotics.Bray's argument in favor of viewing cells and cellular structures as models of natural computational devices is important when considering the more applied theories of wetware to biorobotics.[6] In 1999 William Ditto and his team of researchers at Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University created a basic form of a wetware computer capable of simple addition by harnessing leech neurons.A conventional computer program called the dynamic clamp, capable of reading the electrical pulses from the neurons in real time and interpreting them was written by Eve Marder, a neurobiologist at Brandeis University.[9] Fitch discusses the idea of nano-intentionality, specifically in regards to neurons, in their ability to adjust rearrangements to create neural networks.He states "If a researcher aims to make a conscious machine, doing it with rigid switches (whether vacuum tubes or static silicon chips) is barking up the wrong tree."[9] Fitch believes that an important aspect of the development of areas such as artificial intelligence is wetware with nano-intentionally, and autonomous ability to adapt and restructure itself.In a review of the above-mentioned research conducted by Fitch, Daniel Dennett, a professor at Tufts University, discusses the importance of the distinction between the concept of hardware and software when evaluating the idea of wetware and organic material such as neurons.[10] Wetware computers should not be confused with brain-on-a-chip devices have that are mostly aimed at replacing animal models in preclinical drug screening.Wetware computers may have substantial ethical implications,[12][additional citation(s) needed] for instance related to possible potentials to sentience and suffering and dual-use technology.
Diversity of neuronal morphologies in the auditory cortex
auditory cortexorganicwetwareneuronsWilliam DittoGeorgia Institute of TechnologyadditionbrainsMoore's lawtransistorssilicon chipintegrated circuitsunconventionalbinarychemical conformationhardwaresoftwarebioroboticsDennis Brayribosomestranscription factorsEmory UniversityEve MarderBrandeis Universitylogic gatesarithmeticinput/outputCognitive biologycognitionW. Tecumseh FitchUniversity of ViennaDaniel Dennettbrain-on-a-chipPhilosophy of mindethicalsentiencesufferingneurolawdecline in insect populationsbasidiomycetesmyceliumConnectingof muscle tissuebiocompatibleinto digital systemsperformance-scoresMax Planck Institute for Polymer Researchneuromorphic electronicspolymersreal neuronsArtificial neural networkChemical computerQuantum computerUnconventional computingWetware (brain)BiosensorBiological computingMachine olfactionDiscover MagazineWayback MachineBibcodeDitto, William