Royal assent
[citation needed] In Canada, the governor general may give assent either in person at a ceremony in the Senate or by a written declaration notifying Parliament of their agreement to the bill.[16] Originally, legislative power was exercised by the sovereign acting on the advice of the Curia regis, or Royal Council, in which senior magnates and clerics participated and which evolved into Parliament.Hence, all acts include the clause "Be it enacted by the King's (Queen's) most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows...".During the eleven years of personal rule that followed, Charles performed legally dubious actions such as raising taxes without Parliament's approval.[24] After the Civil War, it was accepted that Parliament should be summoned to meet regularly, but it was still commonplace for monarchs to refuse royal assent to bills.Speaking English as a second language and being at first unfamiliar with British politics and customs, he relied on his ministers to a greater extent than had previous monarchs.Later Hanoverian monarchs attempted to restore royal control over legislation: George III and George IV both openly opposed Catholic Emancipation[30][31] and asserted that to grant assent to a Catholic emancipation bill would violate the Coronation Oath, which required the sovereign to preserve and protect the established Church of England from papal domination, and would grant rights to individuals who were in league with a foreign power which did not recognise their legitimacy.[31] Thus, as the concept of ministerial responsibility has evolved, the power to withhold royal assent has fallen into disuse, both in the United Kingdom and in the other Commonwealth realms.He decided not to withhold assent without "convincing evidence that it would avert a national disaster, or at least have a tranquillising effect on the distracting conditions of the time".[32] It has been mooted that, in modern times, the government could advise the monarch to withhold royal assent, but that elected politicians should strive to avoid such a scenario.[34] After a bill has been passed, the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament submits it to the monarch for royal assent after a four-week period, during which the Advocate General for Scotland, the Lord Advocate, the Attorney General or the Secretary of State for Scotland[35] may refer the bill to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (prior to 1 October 2009, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council) for review of its legality.Before the Lordship of the Island was purchased by the British Crown in 1765 (the Revestment), the assent of the Lord of Mann to a bill was signified by letter to the Governor.[58][59][60] In Papua New Guinea, no royal assent is required for the passage of bills and legislation instead becomes effective on the certification of the speaker of the national parliament."[66] Since the Balfour Declaration of 1926 and the Statute of Westminster 1931, all the Commonwealth realms have been sovereign kingdoms, the monarch and governors-general acting solely on the advice of the local ministers, who generally maintain the support of the legislature and are the ones who secure the passage of bills.The power to withhold the royal assent was exercised by Alberta's Lieutenant Governor, John C. Bowen, in 1937, in respect of three bills passed in the legislature dominated by William Aberhart's Social Credit party.The third, the Accurate News and Information Bill, purported to force newspapers to print government rebuttals to stories to which the provincial cabinet objected.The Clerk of the Parliaments, the chief official of the House of Lords, traditionally pronounces a formula in Anglo-Norman Law French, indicating the sovereign's decision.The sovereign, wearing the Crown, would be seated on the throne in the Lords chamber, surrounded by heralds and members of the royal court—a scene that nowadays is repeated only at the annual State Opening of Parliament.Henry decided that "the repetition of so grievous a Story and the recital of so infamous a crime" in his presence "might reopen a Wound already closing in the Royal Bosom".In 1960, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod arrived to summon the House of Commons during a heated debate and several members protested against the disruption by refusing to attend the ceremony.As the attorney-general explained, "there has been a good deal of resentment not only at the loss of Parliamentary time that has been involved but at the breaking of the thread of a possibly eloquent speech and the disruption of a debate that may be caused.The standard text of the letters patent is set out in the Crown Office (Forms and Proclamations Rules) Order 1992 (SI 1992/1730),[81] with minor amendments in 2000.[83] The Clerk signs one authentic copy of the bill and inserts the date (in English) on which the assent was notified to the two houses after the title of the act.[85] In Canada, the traditional ceremony for granting assent in Parliament was regularly used until the 21st century, long after it had been discontinued in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms.The Belgian constitution requires a theoretically possible refusal of royal sanction to be countersigned—as any other act of the monarch—by a minister responsible before the House of Representatives.[99] Articles 77–79 of the Norwegian constitution specifically grant the monarch of Norway the right to withhold royal assent from any bill passed by the Storting."[100] In Part II of the 1978 Spanish constitution, among provisions concerning the Crown, Article 62(a) invests the sanction (i.e. royal assent) and promulgation of laws with the monarch of Spain.According to Article 91, the monarch shall give his or her assent and promulgate the new law within fifteen days of passage of a bill by the Cortes Generales.Article 92 invests the monarch with the right to call for a referendum, on the advice of the president of the government (commonly referred to in English as the prime minister) and the authorisation of the cortes.In November 2011, the assembly adopted an Arms and Ammunitions (Amendment) Bill, which reduced the possible criminal sentences for the illicit possession of firearms.
King's ConsentKing George VIQueen ElizabethCanadian SenateMonarchyMonarchMonarchismDivine right of kingsMandate of HeavenRoyal prerogativeAbdication systemAbsoluteChinese LegalistCompositeConstitutionalCrowned republicDiarchyDynastic unionElectiveEmirateEthnarchFederalHereditaryKhanateNon-sovereignPentarchyPersonal unionPopularPrincipalityReal unionRegencyCoregencySelf-proclaimedSignoriaTetrarchTriarchyUniversalAquinasBellarmineFilmerHobbesBossuetMaistreBonaldChateaubriandNovalisBalzacCrétineau-JolyCortésBalmesKierkegaardDostoevskyYouweiMaurrasBainvilleKuehnelt-LeddihnBogdanorScrutonYarvinDe RegnoMonarchiaLes Six livres de la RépubliqueLeviathanPatriarchaConsiderations on FranceMazarinPius VIConsalviPlessisMetternichVillèlePolignacDecazesDisraeliCastilloBismarckMetaxasChurchillRenouvinZhirinovskyPopescu-TăriceanuZourabichviliMagna CartaFoundation of the Ottoman EmpireTsarist autocracyBirth of the Dutch RepublicGlorious RevolutionFrench RevolutionEstablishment of the Dutch monarchyTrienio LiberalFirst French EmpireLiberal WarsSecond French EmpireUnification of ItalyMeiji RestorationAustro-Hungarian CompromiseGerman unification5 October 1910 RevolutionProclamation of the Republic in BrazilChinese RevolutionRussian RevolutionSiamese revolution of 1932Birth of the Italian RepublicSpanish transition to democracyIranian RevolutionModern CambodiaNepalese Civil WarAristocracyAutocracyOligarchyAppointmentGreat OfficersHouseholdRetinueCamarillaCourtierFavouriteRoyal guardPrivy councilCrown CouncilMakhzenRiksrådConservatismAuthoritarianTraditionalistDespotism