[3] He became the first to describe it 1846 when he published his book Geological Observations on South America in 1846 and it was named by Darwin after the nearby town of Navidad.[...] The sandstone contains fragments of wood, either in the state of lignite or partially silicified, shark's teeth, and shells in great abundance...Early fossil descriptions from Navidad Formation were those of George Sowerby in Geological Observations on South America (1846) and by Rodolfo Amando Philippi (1887).[1] The coastal exposures extends from the vicinities of San Antonio in the north to Boca Pupuya in the south over a length of 16 km.Part of the sediments are believed to have originated from the basement of the Chilean Coast Range based on the affinities of garnet with the coastal lithologies.Analysis of amphiboles and pyroxenes have led to the conclusion that they and other sediments originate from volcanic and subvolcanic rocks from the Central Valley and the Andean Cordillera.[12] Fossils of the marine crab genera Cancer, Hepatus, Pilumnus, Pinnotheres, Trichopeltarion, Callianassa, Pinnixa and Proterocarcinus have been reported from Navidad Formation.[15] Charcoal found together with pumice is thought to indicate that wildfires ignited by volcanic eruptions were common on land where Mediterranean climate prevailed in the Miocene as well as today.[2][17] Based on a biostratrigraphic analysis Encinas et al. (2008b) suggested a Tortonian to Zanclean (Late Miocene–Early Pliocene) age for Navidad Formation.[9] In 2013 Gutiérrez et al. published an article in Andean Geology claiming an Early to Middle Miocene age for Navidad Formation.