Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability

[1] The CHS was launched on 12 December 2014 in Copenhagen, Denmark[2] as the result of a global consultation process involving 2,000 humanitarian and development practitioners.The revision process led to the 2024 edition of the CHS, which is more people-centred with a simplified structure and clearer language, promoting accessibility to a diverse range of actors supporting people in crisis situations.Some of the notable statements of support are from the European Union, UNDP, UNIDO, International Committee of the Red Cross, Oxfam and from the governments of Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.Furthermore, it has been featured in key documents such as the Commitments on Accountability to Affected People and Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (CAAP) by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), and the first annual synthesis report published by UNOCHA since the World Humanitarian Summit and entitled ‘No Time to Retreat’ (2017).Case studies and best practices show that complying with the CHS indeed increases the overall effectiveness and quality of the work of humanitarian and development organisations.For example, putting emphasis on training (Commitment 7, 8) helps to improve the quality and speed of surge response,[11] improving the way of engagement with communities (Commitment 4) helps to obtain quality information and thus a true understanding of people’s realities,[12] and in general, the CHS contributes to making organisations more transparent[13] and to addressing sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA).
Non-profit organisationSphereCHS AllianceHumanitarian Accountability Partnership InternationalPeople In AidSphere ProjectEuropean UnionInternational Committee of the Red CrossDenmarkGermanyIrelandSwitzerlandUnited KingdomUNOCHAWorld Humanitarian Summitsexual exploitation and abuseHumanitarian aidin conflict zonesHumanitarianismHumanitarian principlesInternational humanitarian lawHenry DunantBattle of SolferinoA Memory of SolferinoRed Cross MovementGeneva ConventionsInternational Humanitarian Fact-Finding CommissionHistory of the United Nations1951 Refugee ConventionGrand BargainLocalisationHumanitarian-Development NexusInter-Agency Standing CommitteeHumanitarian Cluster SystemUNICEFSeville AgreementThe Federation (IFRC)National SocietiesProtective EmblemsAction Against HungerCatholic Relief ServicesDanish Refugee CouncilInternational Medical CorpsInternational Rescue CommitteeIslamic ReliefMédecins du MondeMédecins Sans FrontièresMercy CorpsNorwegian Refugee CouncilGuardian GirlsSave the ChildrenWorld VisionKoyamada International FoundationNEAR NetworkGlobal Refugee-Led NetworkNetwork for Refugee VoicesYemen Relief and Reconstruction FoundationThe State of the Humanitarian SystemThe New HumanitarianReliefWebGlobal Humanitarian OverviewDegan AliJan EgelandChristos ChristouWinnie ByanyimaMartin GriffithsJemilah MahmoodHugo SlimPeter MaurerJames OrbinskiRachel Kiddell-MonroeMacKenzie ScottMelinda GatesJamshedji TataMichael BloombergWarren BuffettBill GatesFCDO (UK)NorwayECHO (EU)CanadaTurkeyFranceBill and Melinda Gates FoundationYield GivingChinese Famine of 1870sGreat Indian Famine of 1870sEthiopian famine 1980s2004 tsunami2010 Haiti earthquake2011 East Africa droughtTyphoon HaiyanCentral African Republic Civil WarWestern African Ebola outbreakIraq WarSouth Sudanese Civil WarRohingya genocideSyrian civil warYemeni Civil WarSphere (organization)Sphere HandbookThe State of the World's Cash 2020Attacks on humanitarian workersAid Worker Security DatabaseWorld Humanitarian DayHealth Care In Danger CampaignKunduz hospital airstrikeAirstrikes on YemenDolo hospital airstrikeHuman RightsInternational developmentPeacekeepingNeocolonialism2015 European migrant crisisDetention Centres in LibyaCrisis mappingHumanitarian Networks and Partnerships WeeksUnited Nations response to the COVID-19 pandemicAid effectiveness