1911 California Proposition 4

[1] It was adopted by the California State Legislature and approved by voters in a referendum held as part of a special election on October 10, 1911.[4] Election evening results appeared to indicate that Proposition 4 would be defeated as there was strong opposition from the San Francisco Bay Area.[5] However, late returns from the agricultural and rural parts of the state overcame majority opposition from Bay Area cities such as San Francisco and Oakland.By their inferior physical strength they are unable to compete on an equal basis in any line of endeavor where ability is determined by sheer bodily prowess.It will not result in wiser laws or better government.”[10] A Los Angeles Times editorial dated September 22, 1911, stated that: “The working man - whether he be a Republican, a Democrat or a Socialist - who walks along Broadway or Spring Street on Saturday afternoon and sees thousands of fashionably-attired girls and women of mature age parading in autos and making woman-suffrage speeches says to himself, ‘Are these butterflies to be entrusted with the task of making laws for me?’” The editorial also stated that “[t]he Times opposes woman suffrage because it does not believe in either the justice or the expediency of burdening the women of California with the duty of voting.”[11] In a Los Angeles Times opinion piece dated October 1, 1911, Democratic State Senator J.B. Sanford, who was Chairman of the Democratic Caucus of California at the time,[12] called women’s suffrage a “disease,” a “political hysteria,” a “cruel and intolerable burden,” and a “backward step in the progress of civilization.”[13] In the same opinion piece published by the Los Angeles Times, Democratic State Senator Sanford also used homophobic language in writing the following about certain classes of people who advocate women’s suffrage: “It is the mannish female politician and the little effeminate, sissy man, and the woman who is dissatisfied with her lot and sorry that she was born a woman.”[14] During the November 3, 1896 General Election, California voters rejected Constitutional Amendment No.
Timeline of women's suffrage in CaliforniaList of California suffragistsElections in CaliforniaFederal governmentU.S. PresidentU.S. Senate1852 sp1857 sp1860 sp1873 sp1886 sp1891 sp1895 sp1900 sp1946 sp1954 sp1992 sp2022 sp2024 spU.S. House of Representatives5th sp32nd sp48th sp50th sp36th sp12th sp10th sp34th sp25th sp22nd sp20th spState governmentExecutiveGovernor2003 (recall)2021 (recall)Lieutenant governorAttorney generalSecretary of stateTreasurerControllerInsurance commissionerSuperintendentBoard of equalizationLegislatureSenateSpecialAssembly79th sp17th spJudiciaryCourt of appealsElections by yearState propositions94, 95, 96, and 9798 and 99Full listLos Angeles CountyBoard of supervisorsLos Angeles1909 (sp)City attorney2019 (sp)2023 (sp)MunicipalSan Diego County1983 (sp)1986 (sp)2005 (sp)2013–14 (sp)City councilSan Francisco1983 (recall)2018 (sp)District attorney2022 (recall)2022 (sp)Board of educationConstitution of CaliforniaCharles W. BellPasadena, CaliforniaCalifornia State LegislaturereferendumCaliforniaU.S. statewomen's suffrageNineteenth Amendment to the U.S. ConstitutionSan Francisco Bay AreaOaklandModoc CountySan Francisco CountyMarin CountySan Mateo CountyAlameda CountyRepublicanDemocraticeditorialsopinion piecesLos Angeles TimesSocialisthomophobicProgressive Eradirect democracyProposition 7initiativeProposition 8recall of public officialsTimeline of the women's suffrage movement in CaliforniaWomen's suffrage in CaliforniaWomen's suffrage in the United StatesWayback MachineNational American Woman Suffrage AssociationNational Woman's PartyCollege Equal Suffrage LeagueFannie Jackson Coppin ClubLaura de Force GordonMyra Virginia SimmonsSelina SolomonsAlice ParkMabel TaliaferroElizabeth Cady StantonSusan B. AnthonyClara Shortridge FoltzAnna DickinsonMaria de LopezEllen Clark SargentLydia Flood JacksonHettie B. TilghmanSarah Massey OvertonMary Hunter AustinMaud YoungerDelilah L. Beasley